Herewith a letter sent to the Archbishop of Canterbury on 16 May 2021. As expected, the letter went unanswered. However, it is my opinion that the actual questions posed in the letter are legit and should be answered. I have done as much as I can to look into the discrepancies. As an individual, I do not have the resources to do more.
Archbishop Welby
Church of England
Your Grace,
I am aware that in your position you may not have the influence to make the decisions and take the actions required, but as the most senior member of your church and having the Queen as the head of your church, I do believe that you have Her Majesty’s ear and that she may take your advice seriously. I therefore beg for your patience and time in considering the contents of this letter.
Her Majesty has been respected and revered the world over and has reigned longer than I have been on this earth. At 95 I respect that she may not have the strength or the health to control every aspect of her extended family’s actions, in particular those of them who are no longer residing in Britain. However it is of the utmost importance that action is taken as soon as possible pertaining to Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle’s actions.
Certain things have come to my attention and I have kept it private out of respect for Her Majesty and my loyalty to the monarchy, but it had also come to my attention that the same information will be used against the monarchy in a warped and untrue version if and when the need arises for the couple to do so. It is therefore my opinion that it would be less damaging to the Queen, Prince Charles and the monarchy as an institution should they address the matter in an honorable, calm and decent manner and admit to mistakes made during the past three years.
As you may be aware social media had been speculating about the circumstances surrounding Archie Harrison Mountbatten Windsor’s birth since before he was born and that the speculation had not died down since. I myself had been one of the people who had been doing so for the past two years and who had been doing so publicly via a YouTube channel. I can only surmise that it is due to my location that I had been taken into some people’s confidence and as such had been passed on particular information. The information I had learned are as follows:
- That Archie Moutbatten Windsor had not been born to Meghan Markle at the Portland Hospital on 6 May 2019. Neither was he born to Meghan Markle at St Mary’s. There was no VIP delivery at either hospital between the period 1/4/2019 and 1/6/2019. As you may or may not know, there is such a thing as a midwife registry and no midwife attended to a delivery to a woman named Meghan Markle / Duchess of Sussex / Meghan Windsor or any name which could identify Meghan Markle as the birth mother. As you may or may not know, there is also the fact that midwives have to register a birth on the EMIS system on the day of the actual birth – no such registration was made on 6 May 2019 for anyone with any combination of names who can be identified as Rachel Meghan Markle.
- All media platforms as well as the book ‘Finding Freedom’ identified Dr Penelope Law as the OBGYN who delivered Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, yet her husband the Earl of Bradford denied this on a public platform and it has come to my attention that they may even have been away on holiday at the time.
- The birth announcement posted at Buckingham Palace was unsigned
- The copy of the birth certificate put out to the media contains a number of anomalies : the same misprint as a sample on Pinterest and other websites, gives the father as ‘Harry’ instead of his legal name ‘Henry’ etc. And then there was the alleged change to the birth certificate which had Rachel Meghan Markle’s name left out as the legal mother, but instead just gave a title. This is suspicious as there is no reason for this change to be made other than the possibility that she was not the birth mother.
- The christening : According to the church’s own website there was a synod meeting on the weekend of 6 July 2019, one which you yourself attended. There was also a meeting of senior clergy until 12:30 on that particular Saturday. I have also received a letter from a niece of a member of the clergy stating that you were seen at the synod meeting. A number of enquiries to your church had failed to explain how you could have been in York and conducting the christening at the same time. Similar to Ms Markle’s allegation that you married them three days prior to the official wedding, this places you in a very difficult position and I recognize the fact with empathy for you. However, the truth prevails over all else and in my opinion it is not befitting of the most senior member of a church to allow for these lies and deception to be perpetrated on the public.
It is thus my opinion that Ms Markle and Prince Harry had a surrogate to birth their child and that the child was not born ‘of the body’ of the lawful wife of the 6th in line to the throne. It is therefore also my opinion that Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor should not be included in the line of succession as that would be contrary to the current rules of succession. It is my opinion that he could only be included should a full DNA test reveal that he has both the DNA of Prince Harry and his wife and that it would then further require a letters patent from Her Majesty to change the current laws of succession. As Prince Harry no longer resides in Britain and does not intend returning it is my opinion that this would not be necessary but that the child should be removed from the line of succession forthwith.
Furthermore, it has also come to my attention, via fairly prominent people in the US, that Ms Markle will find a way to blame the Royal Family for perpetrating a fraud on the people of the world by pretending to carry the child herself. It is also my opinion that the truth of the child’s birth will be made public before the end of this year and that Ms Markle will then find herself in an embarrassing situation where she will certainly, judged by her previous conduct in the Oprah interview, tell ‘her truth’. This will paint the Royal Family in a very bad light as well as incriminate them as co-conspirators in this lie and fraud. It is my opinion that it would be in their best interest to make known the absolute truth – whatever that may be – in a proper statement. Should this be done in the way the Royal Family had to date conducted all their proper and decent statements I am of the opinion that they will be forgiven and will even have the empathy/sympathy of all their subjects and loyal supporters. With the knowledge I have I am sincere in my belief that the truth will be made known within the next few months and that it would be of the utmost importance that the Royal Family preempt this in a truthful manner and not wait until it is revealed via other sources.
I trust that you will take this under advisement and will discuss the matter as well as your own position in this regard with Her Majesty and/or her son Prince Charles, as soon as possible.
Kind regards and blessings,