Prince William
The Duke of Cambridge
Your Royal Highness,
From past experience I know that your office is the only royal office who will respond to correspondence in this regard, even if just acknowledging receipt of the letter. I am aware that you employ media relation staff, however the media and social media is a vast area to cover and hence I feel it my duty to liaise with you and put forth certain observations.
It is my opinion that due to changing times and increased communications via the internet that the royal family’s rule of not addressing certain issues and serious questions/allegations is not conducive to the much needed transparency of the royal family, nor does it show respect for your loyal subjects who wish to love, honor and trust you. As someone using social media on a daily basis for work and social endeavors I am in a position to evaluate the public’s changing attitude towards the royal family and it saddens me.
Here is a list of matters the Royal Family should address as soon as possible in order to maintain the trust and loyalty of its subjects:
1. Prince Henry and his wife Meghan Markle’s increased political affiliations and ambitions : As they are still on the royal website and still have royal titles gifted to them by Her Majesty, it is assumed that they still represent the United Kingdom and Her Majesty the Queen. As a constitutional monarchy it is not acceptable for any member of the family representing the Queen in any capacity to be politically biased. Nor is it acceptable for a British royal to, in any way, interfere with another country’s politics or political process.
2. Archie Harrison Mounbatten-Windsor and Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor : These children are currently 7th and 8th in line to the throne, yet circumstances surrounding Archie’s birth are still in question and have never been adequately addressed. I shall not go into detail as I am sure you are very much aware of what I am referring to. The same applies to Lilibet and worse – No one has seen this child yet and added to that, it had been confirmed by the US Department of Health and other officers that the birth certificate / proof of life certificate which was released via the media, and in particular TMZ, was not an acceptable / true certificate, but most likely a fake or false representation of a US document. As I am aware that staff /aides in service of your father/grandmother are monitoring certain social media accounts and sites, I would thus assume that you are aware of the discrepancies pertaining to the children’s births. It is unacceptable to add these children to the line of succession with these matters unanswered and it places a dark cloud of suspicion over the entire Royal Family.
3. According to the US constitution it is unacceptable for members of any foreign royal family to use or profit from their foreign titles and such titles are not recognized by the US. Yet, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are continuously using their titles to profit and gain access to officials, receive special treatment. receive media attention and interfere in matters they are not qualified to interfere in. To date the Royal Family had failed to address this debacle in any shape or form.
4. Nor has the Royal Family formally addressed the now 20 lies told in the Oprah interview by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. By not addressing these matters formally the Royal Family is allowing for wild allegations and rumours to surface and do the rounds on social media, severely damaging the Royal Family’s reputation. By not addressing these allegations and lies the Royal Family is also allowing for the reputation of other loyal servants of the monarchy to be damaged, eg. the Archbishop of Canterbury.
5. The matter of Prince Henry’s residence in the United States is also still in question. It is unclear on what type of visa he is residing in the United States or whether he will or will not apply for US citizenship in the future. The fact that this is not made known could indicate that the Duke is receiving preferential treatment and this in itself could set a legal precedent for others seeking residency in the US. Also, should the Duke plan to continue to reside in the US or apply for citizenship in the future his titles should be stripped or put in abeyance immediately.
I trust that this correspondence will reach you and be considered in the respectful manner it was intended.
Yours sincerely
